Strict Scrutiny: Government may interfere with certain liberties granted when there is a "necessary" requirement to regulate it "in the public interest". Some claims of liberties at intermediate scrutiny level comprises of gender, and illegitimacy. When the constitutionality of a law is challenged, both state and federal courts will commonly apply one of three levels of judicial scrutiny from the spectrum of scrutiny: Strict scrutiny Intermediate scrutiny Rational basis review The level of scrutiny that's applied determines how a court will go about analyzing a law and its effects. What are the 3 levels of scrutiny Is age strict scrutiny What is an example of strict scrutiny What is negative scrutiny. Scrutiny can also be an intense look, like when your mother looks at you trying to tell if you might be lying. Intermediate Scrutiny: Government may interfere with certain liberties granted when there is a "substantial" requirement to regulate it "in the public interest". Scrutiny is when you look at something really closely, like when you are checking a test for mistakes. Some claims of liberties at minimal scrutiny level comprises of martial sexual privacy, abortion during the first weeks of pregnancy, family living privacy, educating children in private schools, departure from confinement in governmental institutions for the disabled, and public education to children of illegal immigrants. It is, generally, impossible for a state to fail minimal scrutiny test. Minimal Scrutiny: Government may interfere with certain liberties granted when there is a "rational" and "valid" requirement to regulate it "in the public interest". Dowell,35 and Green, 6 the Supreme Court turned its attention to the task of establishing standards for. The courts apply three different levels of scrutiny to determine if the law violates equal protection clause. What are the three levels of scrutiny that the courts use in determining whether a law violates the equal protection clause?
Using the information presented in the chapter, answer the following questions.
Alderman asserted that the statute violated the equal protection clause because it placed requirements on motorcyclists that were not imposed on other motorists. Jim Alderman, a licensed motorcycle operator, sued the state to block enforcement of the law. A state legislature enacted a statute that required any motorcycle operator or passenger on the state's highways to wear a protective helmet.